Admin Law Question 1 + 2 (750-750 words) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Admin law Question 1 + 2 (750-750 words) - Essay ExampleBy s1 of the 1967 Act he is appointed by the Queen on the advice of the PM and holds office until the age of 65.Especially in relation to JR, the procedural requirements of unrestricted law element, leave, locus standi, time limits and grounds often deny speedy redress to the applicant. Matters such as delay, incompetence, stupidity, loss of documents, rudeness etc cannot be the subject to the JR. But, these fall within PCAs jurisdiction.Disadvantage the system of macrophages check the legitimacy of complaints and it is called MP Filter. If a MP is the main culprit, claimants never get redress. In this grit MP enjoy more power. At the same time each year lots of earn of complain arises which not possible to review for an ombudsman. The most important factor to mention is the ombudsman will not investigate complaints where an alternate remedy exists. Ombudsmans powers of investigation are limited, for example-maladministrati on.3) The PCA has had an impact on certain more naughty profile cases such as Sachsendhausen case where the PCA found maladministration in distributing compensation. A recent example is the Barlow Clowes encounter.Jurisdiction The 1967 Act should be amended to provide that the PCA could investigate all complaints another(prenominal) than those relating to matters specifically excluded. However, the govt. spurned this proposal.However MPs have some great advantages as redressers of grievances. Their services are free and tardily accessible many MPs take great pains to advertise their surgery times and other means of contract in the local media. Most are assiduous in taking up grievances, and often the mere fact of receiving a letter from an MP, rather than from an ordinary citizen, will induce the place to give a favorable response. Further, the Mps services are equally useful whether the circumstances is asking for the correction of an error or the more favorable exercise of discretion, where no legal